A coder said that learning to code from the coding books is more challenging than coding in real life.
I couldn’t process what she said, and I had to ask the coder to clarify her statement.
According to the coder, she learned to code from her books in class. Using her books meant that she had to look up the terms, interpret the guidelines, code first, code also, check NCCI edits, check for bundling edits, sequence correctly, and link diagnosis code(s) to CPT code(s) (among other things).
When she sat for her coding certification, she also had to use her books.
It’s called manual coding, people! It is “real-life” coding. It’s what we all did before encoders and other coding software was around. It’s also what we do when the system is down, and coding production has to continue.
As an employee, the coder uses an encoder or other coding software instead of her books. She enters keywords, selects options from drop-down menus, answers a few questions, and the encoder suggests CPT, HCPCS, ICD, and modifiers.
But, if one answer or term is entered incorrectly by the coder, the software may suggest an incorrect code.
Computer-assisted coding suggests codes from keywords in the documentation, and the coder either agrees with the codes or makes changes.
By the way, I have audited coders who used computer-assisted coding software and failed them because they agreed with whatever incorrect codes were auto-suggested.
If you’re using an encoder or computer-assisted coding software, you have to have the coding knowledge to validate the codes suggested by the encoder.
As I wrote in Encoder Dependent,
The coder is either not gaining, or is losing coding knowledge. The coder will not know or will forget general coding and chapter-specific guidelines. Will the coder know a code has an age or sex restriction? Will the coder know the difference between Exclude 1 versus Exclude 2? Will the coder know the code cannot be reported as a primary diagnosis? Will the coder understand etiology/manifestation coding rules and the importance of sequencing? Will the coder be able to follow the code-level notations?
So, no. Whether you’re using an encoder or coding from your books, real-life coding is challenging.